1 Allott, A. J. 1965: “Categories or the description of verbal syntagma in Burmese.” In: Lingua 15, pp. 186–227.

2 Bernot, D. 1980: Le prédicat en birman parlé. Paris.

3 Bhat, D. N. S. 1999: The prominence of tense, aspect and mood. Amsterdam.

4 Chit Hlaing, F. K. L. 2005: “Towards a formal cognitive theory of grammatical aspect and its treatment in Burmese.” In: Watkins 2005, pp. 125–142.

5 Gärtner, U. 2005: “Is the Myanmar language really tenseless?” In: Watkins 2005, pp. 105–124.

6 Hnin Tun, S. S. 2007: Review of: Romeo 2008. In: Geolinguistics 33, pp. 174–178.

7 Jenny, M. 2001: “The aspect system of Thai.” In: K. H. Ebert / F. Zúñiga (eds.): Aktionsart and aspectotemporality in non-European languages. Zurich, pp. 97–140.

8 Jenny, M. 2009: “Modality in Burmese: ‘may’ or ‘must’—grammatical uses of yá ‘get’.” In: Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1, pp. 111–126.

9 Johanson, L. 2000: “Viewpoint operators in European languages.” In: Ö. Dahl (e d.): Tense and aspect in European languages. Berlin, pp. 27–187.

10 Okell, J. 1979: “‘Still’ and ‘anymore’ in Burmese.” In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 4:2, pp. 69–82.

11 Sasse, H.-J. 1991 a: “Aspect and Aktionsart: A reconciliation.” In: C. Vetter / W. Vanderweghe (eds.): Perspectives on aspect and aktionsart. Bruxelles (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6), pp. 31–46.

12 Sasse, H.-J. 1991 b: “Aspekttheorie.” In: H.-J. Sasse (ed.): Aspektsysteme. Köln, pp. 1–35.

13 Smith, C. S. 1997: The parameter of aspect. 2nd edition. Dordrecht/Boston/London (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 43).

14 Van Valin, R. D., Jr. 2005: Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge.

15 Van Valin, R. D., Jr. / R. La Polla 1997: Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge.

16 Vittrant, A. 2005: “Burmese as a modality-prominent language.” In: Watkins 2005, pp. 143–161.

17 Vittrant, A. 2009: Review of: Romeo 2008. In: Studies in Language 33:3, pp. 766–775.

18 Watkins, J. (ed.) 2005: Studies in Burmese linguistics. Canberra.