Weiter zum Inhalt

The Northern Dialects of Domari

Seiten 407 - 450

DOI https://doi.org/10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.164.2.0407


Domari is an archaic Indo-Aryan language spoken by the Middle-Eastern Gypsies whose self-appellation is Dom. The language, known to us from various word lists from the 19th century, two descriptions of the variety spoken in Palestine and a grammatical sketch of the dialect of Aleppo, remains largely under-studied. This paper presents original data collected amongst speakers of two undocumented varieties—Beirut Domari and Saraqib Domari (northern Syria)—and contrast them with Palestinian Domari and Aleppo Domari. It appears clearly that the dialects of Aleppo, Saraqib and Beirut are closely related and diverge to a large extent from Palestinian Domari. It is therefore possible to postulate the existence of two dialectal areas: northern Domari to which the varieties of Aleppo, Saraqib and Beirut belong and southern Domari, represented by the dialect spoken in Palestine.


1 Al-Jibāwī, ʿA. 2006: ʿašāʾir al-nawar fī bilād al-šām [Gypsy clans in the Levant]. Damascus.

2 Finegan, E. 2011: Language: Its Structure and Use. Boston.

3 Germanos, M. 2009: Identification et emplois de quelques stéréotypes, traits saillants et autres variables sociolinguistiques à Beyrouth (Liban). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Paris.

4 Göksel, A. / C. Kerslake 2005: Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London.

5 Groome, F. 1891: “Persian and Syrian Gypsies.” In: Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society 2, pp. 21–27.

6 Herin, B. 2012: “The Domari language of Aleppo (Syria).” In: Linguistic Discovery 10,2, pp. 1–52.

7 Lewis, M. (ed) 2009: Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Dallas.

8 Macalister, R. A. S. 1914: The language of the Nawar or Zutt, the nomad smiths of Palestine. London (Gypsy Lore Society Monographs 3).

9 Masica, C. 1991: The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge.

10 Matras, Y. 1999: “The State of Present Day Domari in Jerusalem.” In: Mediterranean Language Review 11, pp. 1–58.

11 Matras, Y. 2002: Romani. A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge.

12 Matras, Y. 2005: “Defining the limits of grammatical borrowing.” In: A. Marcantonio (ed.): The Indo-European language family: Questions about its status. Washington, D.C. (Journal of Indo-European Studies. Monograph 55).

13 Matras, Y. 2012: “A grammatical sketch of Domari.” In: A. Rusakov / A. Kibrik (eds.): Languages of the World: Indo-Iranian languages. Moscow, pp. 775–811.

14 Matras, Y. / V. Elšík 2001: Romani dialectological questionnaire. Manchester.

15 Meyer, F. 1994: Dōm und Turkmān in Stadt und Land Damaskus. Erlangen.

16 Meyer, F. 2005: “Biography and Identity in Damascus: A Syrian Nawar Chief.” In: J. Berland / A. Rao (eds.): Customary Strangers. New Perspectives on Peripatetic Peoples in the Middle-East, Africa, and Asia. Santa Barbara, pp. 71–92.

17 Ouseley, W. 1823: Travels in Various Countries of the East; more particularly Persia. London.

18 Pott, A. 1846: “Über die Sprache der Zigeuner in Syrien.” In: Zeitschrift für die Wissenschaft der Sprache 1, pp. 75–186.

19 Turner, R. L. 1962–1966: A comparative dictionary of Indo-Aryan languages. London.


Export Citation